News

Law

Asset Management

Investment Banking

Wealth

Hedge Funds

People

Newsletters

Events

Lists

Regulation

Why Mifid II is missing the mark, nine months in

A proliferation of new trading venues has left traders less clear on best execution and damaged regulators’ attempts to increase transparency

Something's up: A trader monitors markets at the Frankfurt Stock Exchange on the day of Mifid II's implementation, January 3 2018
Something's up: A trader monitors markets at the Frankfurt Stock Exchange on the day of Mifid II's implementation, January 3 2018 Photo: Getty Images

It’s been more than nine months since regulators overhauled European market structure, but things haven’t gone quite to plan.

Negotiations on the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive — or Mifid II — started in the aftermath of the financial crisis, with transparency dominating regulators’ thinking. This was obvious in the final legislation through rules that separated payments for trade execution and research, introduced pre and post-trade transparency for fixed income instruments and pushed over-the-counter derivatives onto regulated markets.

WSJ Logo